Acceptability of Parental Financial Incentives and Quasi-Mandatory Interventions for Preschool Vaccinations: Triangulation of Findings from Three Linked Studies.

Tuesday, 7th of June 2016

PLoS One. 2016 Jun 2;11(6):e0156843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156843. eCollection 2016.

Acceptability of Parental Financial Incentives and Quasi-Mandatory Interventions for Preschool Vaccinations: Triangulation of Findings from Three Linked Studies.

Adams J¹ McNaughton RJ² Wigham S³ Flynn D⁴ Ternent L⁴ Shucksmith J².

Author information

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Childhood vaccinations are a core component of public health programmes globally. Recent measles outbreaks in the UK and USA have prompted debates about new ways to increase uptake of childhood vaccinations. Parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions (e.g. restricting entry to educational settings to fully vaccinated children) have been successfully used to increase uptake of childhood vaccinations in developing countries but there is limited evidence of effectiveness in developed countries. Even if confirmed to be effective widespread implementation of these interventions is dependent on acceptability to parents professionals and other stakeholders.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic review (n = 11 studies included) a qualitative study with parents (n = 91) and relevant professionals (n = 24) and an on-line survey with embedded discrete choice experiment with parents (n = 521) exploring acceptability of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions for preschool vaccinations. Here we use Triangulation Protocol to synthesise findings from the three studies.

RESULTS:

There was a consistent recognition that incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions could be effective particularly in more disadvantaged groups. Universal incentives were consistently preferred to targeted ones but relative preferences for quasi-mandatory interventions and universal incentives varied between studies. The qualitative work revealed a consistent belief that financial incentives were not considered an appropriate motivation for vaccinating children. The costs of financial incentive interventions appeared particularly salient and there were consistent concerns in the qualitative work that incentives did not represent the best use of resources for promoting preschool vaccinations. Various suggestions for improving delivery of the current UK vaccination programme as an alternative to incentives and quasi-mandates were made.

CONCLUSIONS:

Parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions for increasing uptake of preschool vaccinations do not currently attract widespread enthusiastic support in the UK; but some potential benefits of these approaches are recognised.