Vaccination Coverage among Children in Kindergarten — United States 2014–15 School Year

Friday, 13th of November 2015

Vaccination Coverage among Children in Kindergarten — United States 2014–15 School Year

Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

August 28 2015 / 64(33) 897904

Best read with tables in http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6433a2.htm

Ranee Seither MPH Kayla Calhoun MS Cynthia L. Knighton Jenelle Mellerson MPH Seth Meador Ashley Tippins MPH Stacie M. Greby DVM Vance Dietz MD

 

State and local jurisdictions require children to be vaccinated before starting school to maintain high vaccination coverage and protect schoolchildren from vaccine preventable diseases (1). State vaccination requirements which include school vaccination and exemption laws and health department regulations permit medical exemptions for students with a medical contraindication to receiving a vaccine or vaccine component and may allow nonmedical exemptions for religious reasons or philosophic beliefs. To monitor state and national vaccination coverage and exemption levels among children attending kindergarten CDC analyzes school vaccination data collected by federally funded state local and territorial immunization programs. This report describes vaccination coverage estimates in 49 states and the District of Columbia (DC) and vaccination exemption estimates in 46 states and DC that reported the number of children with at least one exemption among kindergartners during the 2014–15 school year. Median vaccination coverage* was 94.0% for 2 doses of measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine 94.2% for the local requirements for diphtheria tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) and 93.6% for 2 doses of varicella vaccine among the 39 states and DC with a 2dose requirement. The median percentage of any exemptions† was 1.7%. Although statewide vaccination coverage among kindergartners was high during the 2014–15 school year geographic pockets of low vaccination coverage and high exemption levels can place children at risk for vaccine preventable diseases (2). Appropriate school vaccination coverage assessments can help immunization programs identify clusters of low coverage and develop partnerships with schools and communities to ensure that children are protected from vaccine preventable diseases.

Federally funded immunization programs work with health departments education departments school nurses or other school personnel to assess the vaccination and exemption status (as defined by state and local school vaccination requirements) of children enrolled in public and private kindergartens. Among the 50 states and DC 44 programs used an immunization information system as a source of data for their assessment. For the 2014–15 school year the type of vaccination assessment varied 29 programs used a census including all kindergartners in all schools two used a voluntary response¶ of schools 10 used a sample** and 10 used a mix of methods.†† Three states (Alaska Kansas and New Mexico) used a sample to collect vaccination coverage data and a census for exemption data. Two local areas (Houston Texas New York New York) reported separately. Because these areas are represented in their respective state reports the area specific data are not included in the calculation of median MMR DTaP and varicella vaccine coverage and medical nonmedical and any exemption levels.§§

Data from the assessments were aggregated by state or area and sent to CDC. California Minnesota Oregon Pennsylvania and Vermont reported data for selected homeschooled kindergartners.*** The 49 states and DC reported vaccination coverage data for 4121322 kindergartners and 46 states and DC reported exemption data including the number of children with at least one exemption for 3829686kindergartners.†††

Vaccination coverage was used to identify state/local areas with high (≥90%) 2dose MMR coverage (3) and median vaccination coverage was used to assess progress toward the national Healthy People 2020 target of ≥95% vaccination coverage for kindergartners.§§§ The reported medians for medical and any exemptions include the 45 states and DC that reported data for all types of allowed exemptions whereas the median for nonmedical exemptions includes 46 states and DC that reported for at least one type of allowed exemption the number of children with an exemption. Coverage and exemption estimates were adjusted based on survey type and response rates. State and local vaccination requirements for school entry varied.¶¶¶ Kindergartners were considered up to date for any vaccine if they received all doses required for school entry in their residence jurisdiction. In most jurisdictions kindergartners with a history of varicella disease are considered to be vaccinated against varicella whereas in some jurisdictions they may be given a medical exemption. Eight states considered kindergartners up to date only if they had received all doses of all vaccines required for school entry in their jurisdiction.**** Coverage estimates were based on completed vaccination series in those jurisdictions. Among all 50 states and DC 13 met CDC standards for school assessment methods in 2014–15.††††

Among the 49 reporting states and DC median reported MMR coverage was 94.0% (range = 86.9% [Colorado] to 99.2% [Mississippi]) 17 areas reported MMR coverage ≥95% and seven reported MMR coverage <90% (Table 1). Median reported DTaP coverage was 94.2% (range = 84.3% [Colorado] to 99.6% [Maryland]) 21 areas reported coverage ≥95%. Among the 39 states and DC requiring and reporting 2dose varicella vaccination coverage median reported coverage was 93.6% (range = 85.4% [Colorado] to 99.2% [Mississippi]) 17 areas reported coverage ≥95%.

Among the 45 states and DC reporting vaccination exemption data for any medical and nonmedical exemptions allowed in the jurisdictions the percentage of kindergartners with any exemption was <1% in six states and ≥4% in 11 states (range = <0.1% [Mississippi] to 6.5% [Idaho]) with a median of 1.7% (Figure) (Table 2). Three states (Kansas Maine and Oregon) reported a decrease of >1.0 percentage points in exemptions from the 2013–14 school year to the 2014–15 school year. Where reported separately the median percentage of medical exemptions was 0.2% (range = <0.1% in four states [Colorado Hawaii Mississippi and Arkansas] to 1.3% [Alaska]). Where allowed and reported separately the median percentage of nonmedical exemptions was 1.5% (range = 0.5% [DC] to 6.2% [Idaho]).

Discussion

Most federally funded immunization programs reported high vaccination coverage and low levels of exemptions among kindergartners. Even so 32 states and DC did not report meeting the Healthy People 2020 target of ≥95% coverage with 2 MMR doses§§§§ and seven states had <90% 2dose MMR coverage. During 2015 measles outbreak cases have included 68 unvaccinated U.S. residents among whom 29 (43%) cited philosophic or religious objections to vaccination (4). Maintaining high vaccination coverage levels is important for measles control and elimination (3).

CDCs Public Health Law Program recently reviewed state school and childcare vaccination requirements and provided a summary of state vaccination laws including both statutes and regulations (5). State laws are subject to change and will continue to be tracked. For example earlier this year California removed both religious and philosophic exemptions for children attending public and private schools and eliminated all vaccination requirements for homeschooled children and Vermont removed philosophic but not religious exemptions for children in public and private schools. Both changes take effect at the beginning of the 2016–17 school year (67). Both states will continue to allow medical exemptions. Changes in vaccination requirements have resulted in changes in patterns of types of exemptions claimed with an increase in the proportion of kindergartners with medical exemptions offsetting decreases in the proportion of kindergartners with nonmedical exemptions (8). Parents have the option depending on state vaccination requirements to place their children in private schools or to homeschool them to avoid state laws regarding exemptions. Continued monitoring of trends in vaccination coverage and exemptions including the number of children exempted by type of exemption and enrollment in public and private schools or homeschools will be critical to identify the potential impact of changes in school vaccination requirements.

The current assessment methods used to estimate coverage and exemptions in many states might be insufficient for immunization programs to identify children or communities at risk for vaccinepreventable diseases and might limit the ability of immunization programs to respond to outbreaks. In assessing school vaccination coverage and exemptions states must balance the need for efficiency accuracy and ability to have estimates at the community school or child level. Using immunization information system vaccination data can streamline data collection and provide accurate vaccination coverage data at the community child and possibly school levels. A census report by all schools provides local data but might be more resourceintensive to obtain. Statistically appropriate sampling methods can streamline data collection and can be used to validate census data but do not provide local data. Using a census to track exemptions is preferred to ensure that immunization and education programs can identify geographic clusters of high exemption levels at the school or community level. To track vaccination coverage it is desirable to use immunization information system data or census data with a sample validation of vaccination status. Schools with high exemption rates do not necessarily have low vaccination rates (e.g. if many exemptions are filed for convenience by parents of fully vaccinated children) and a low exemption rate does not necessarily imply a high vaccination rate (e.g. if school vaccination requirements are not applied in a school with lower vaccination rates). Local availability of reliable information might lead to improved and effective engagements with local partner organizations including private and homeschool associations and the community to enhance understanding of school vaccination requirements and address concerns thereby helping to ensure that children are protected against vaccine preventable diseases. Availability of local data can also help parents understand their childs risk within their school and community. During the 2014–15 school year 21 states provided local level coverage and exemption data online¶¶¶¶ compared with 18 last school year and 11 in 2012–13.

The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First immunization programs used different school vaccination assessment methods. Assessments based on surveys or voluntary response (e.g. an incomplete census) can miss schools with higher or lower vaccination coverage and thereby bias results. Surveys with inadequate sample size will yield imprecise estimates. Additionally differences in reporting vaccine specific vaccination coverage and exemption data limit comparability across all immunization programs. Second exemption status does not always reflect vaccination status. A child with an exemption might not be completely unvaccinated. Although state reported exemptions varied from <0.1% to 6.5% in this assessment >99% of the 2009–2011 birth cohort who became kindergartners in 2014–15 received at least one vaccine in early childhood (9). An exemption may be given for all vaccines even if a child missed all doses of a single vaccine or a single vaccine dose. Parents or guardians might have obtained an exemption rather than submit documentation of a childs vaccination history. This could account for up to 25% of nonmedical exemptions (10). Vaccination and exemption status reflected the childs status at the time of assessment or at an earlier point in the school year and might not have been updated when the child later received needed vaccines. Furthermore exemptions do not account for all under vaccinated kindergartners. Third because immunization programs do not have vaccination coverage and exemption data on all kindergartners including those who are in private schools in boarding schools or are homeschooled where vaccination requirements might be different or not measured actual vaccination coverage could be different from estimates presented in this report. Finally adjustments to account for nonresponse assumed similar vaccination coverage and level of exemptions among non respondents and respondents within the same school type.

School vaccination regulations provide an opportunity for children who are behind on vaccination in infancy to be vaccinated by school entry. For example the kindergartners covered in this report were born during 2009–2011. Despite differences in methodologies when this cohort of children was included in the National Immunization Survey of children aged 19–35 months their coverage with ≥1 MMR dose was 90.8% compared with a median of 94.0% who had received ≥2 doses in this assessment during the school 2014–15 school year (9). Appropriate school vaccination coverage assessments at the state and local levels for all kindergartners will be critical to aid in identification of communities at risk for vaccine preventable disease transmission where further action could improve vaccination coverage to ensure that more children are able to benefit from the protection offered by vaccines.

¹Immunization Services Division National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases CDC ²Carter Consulting Inc. Atlanta Georgia ³Leidos Atlanta Georgia.

Corresponding author Ranee Seither rseither@cdc.gov 4046398693.

References

1. Orenstein WA Hinman AR. The immunization system in the United States—the role of school immunization laws. Vaccine 199917(Suppl 3)S19–24.
2. Omer SB Enger KS Moulton LH Halsey NA Stokley S Salmon DA. Geographic clustering of nonmedical exemptions to school immunization requirements and associations with geographic clustering of pertussis. Am J Epidemiol 20081681389–96.
3. Fine PEM Mulholland K. Community immunity. In Plotkin SA Orenstein WA Offit PA eds. Vaccines. 6th ed. Chapter 71. Philadelphia PA Elsevier Inc. 20131395–412.
4. Clemmons NS Gastanaduy PA Fiebelkorn AP Redd SB Wallace GS. Measles—United States January 4–April 2 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 201564373–6.
5. CDC. State school and childcare vaccination laws. Available at http//www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/topic/vaccinations.html.
6. California Department of Public Health. New Law (SB 277) effective in 2016. Available athttp//www.shotsforschool.org/laws/exemptions.
7. Burbank A. Shumlin signs bill removing vaccine exemption. Available athttp//www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/politics/2015/05/28/shumlinvaccinephilosophicalexemption/28079499.
8. Seither R Masalovich S Knighton CL Mellerson J Singleton JA Greby SM. Vaccination coverage among children in kindergarten—United States 2013–14 school year. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 201463913–20.
9. CDC. National state and local area vaccination coverage among children aged 19–35 months—United States 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 201362733–40.

10.  Luthy KE Beckstrand RL Callister LC Cahoon S. Reasons parents exempt children from receiving immunizations. J Sch Nurs 201228153–60.